At this point, we require component service names to be unique across the application. This can likely be relaxed in 2.0 if we qualify component service names internally with the component name (similar to what we do with references). SWITCHYARD-1525 would cover that.
Thank you for the prompt confirmation. So, once SWITCHYARD-1525 is implemented in the future, can we use the @ServiceOperation annotation something like the following?
private Invoker greateMethod;
1 of 1 people found this helpful
Yes, something like that would be required. Would you mind adding that as a comment in the JIRA?
Sure. Thanks, Keith!