This content has been marked as final.
Show 4 replies
-
1. Re: jaws vs. jbosscmp-jdbc suggestion
mk637 Nov 24, 2004 7:17 AM (in response to lefou)This sounds like a misunderstanding...
There is no jaws.xml, there is a jaws.dtd and this is - according to my understanding - the descriptor file for the jbosscmp-jdbc.xml file.
And of course the latter is still a very important configuration file for JBoss. -
2. Re: jaws vs. jbosscmp-jdbc suggestion
lefou Nov 24, 2004 9:04 AM (in response to lefou)"mk637" wrote:
This sounds like a misunderstanding...
There is no jaws.xml, there is a jaws.dtd and this is - according to my understanding - the descriptor file for the jbosscmp-jdbc.xml file.
I cannot believe this. The JBoss 3.0 Documentation speak from a jaws.xml in chapter 6 with the xml root element \<jaws\>, but the JBoss Admin Development Guilde speak about a jbosscmp-jdbc.xml file with root element \<jbosscmp-jdbc\>
So, both exists and both define some \<datasource\> ... \</datasource\> stuff.
Totally confused. Can anybody help? -
3. Re: jaws vs. jbosscmp-jdbc suggestion
starksm64 Nov 24, 2004 9:34 AM (in response to lefou)JAWS was the old cmp1.1 engine that is obsolete and no longer supported. The jbosscmp-jdbc.xml is the cmp2.x engine that supports 1.1 style entity beans. The cmp2.x engine is far more capable.
-
4. Re: jaws vs. jbosscmp-jdbc suggestion
lefou Nov 24, 2004 10:19 AM (in response to lefou)Is it possible, to define more than one datasoure (with different transaction levels) ?