It looks like you are only one who cares about it.
I am not a big fun and/or expert in trinidad. My interest here is only formal. mvn install should work there.
We have enhanced the resource subframework. This was a main motivation why special extensions for Seam and Trinidad used to be required.
It has solved the problem with Seam. What about Trinidad - it has to be tested. Looks like you are the one who can ;-)
:) If I'm the only one who can, then Red Hat should employ me.
Seriously, the reason I care about Trinidad is that it has a file upload component and a powerful tree table. Somebody from JBoss (maybe you, I don't remember exactly) told me that the tree table component is under plan, but when?
About the file upload component, I was able to use the one from Tomahawk with richfaces but then I would be very embarrassed if our customer asked why I used tomahawk and richfaces together. I would say because richfaces doesn't have that component. Then they would continue with if that library doesn't have a necessary and quite basic component like a file upload, why do you choose them? Because of its beautiful skin is my answer.
Does anybody using richfaces never have a need of uploading a file or showing data in a tree table?