> Is the intention to simply tunnel through JMX (i.e.
> where arg 2 of mbeanserver.invoke() is actually
> "invoke") or are we expecting to truly expose ejbean
> methods as MBean operations (which appear in the
well, the latter would seem to be better suited for using the EJBs as services, using different JMX connectors to invoke them, and allowing things like JMX <-> WSDL adaptors to be used to access EJBs.
> Whatever the intention I'm curious (juha) what the
> XMBean role is going to be.
mmmm.. I have a bad hangover, can you ask that again tomorrow? ]:)
Or just post your own ideas, we can see how much we agree on. :p