This content has been marked as final.
Show 3 replies
-
1. Re: there's a SerializableFactory ?
adrian.brock Dec 5, 2002 6:44 AM (in response to blakbox)Bind the HashMap directly?
Of course if the HashMap contains non-serializble
objects it won't work.
And the client will get a copy of the HashMap
Why not create a stateless session bean to give
remote access to the HashMap?
Regards,
Adrian -
2. Re: there's a SerializableFactory ?
blakbox Dec 6, 2002 3:51 AM (in response to blakbox)i'm sorry, was a stupid question.
Before i posted that question, i've tried to bind directly, but it not worked, because i forgot doing serializable the objects into the hashmap.
Thank you,
Luis -
3. Re: there's a SerializableFactory ?
remrick Mar 11, 2004 3:15 PM (in response to blakbox)Adrian,
Forgive me if this is appears to be a "dumb question" but I'd like to be sure... when you say "Bind the HashMap directly" i assume you mean use InitialContext.bind(), correct?
Thanks,
-Ron