This content has been marked as final.
Show 2 replies
-
1. Re: JCA 1.5 development
fjcarretero Jun 7, 2005 4:20 AM (in response to fjcarretero)Hi all,
I think I'm getting closer. I have tried to make a transaction with 2 resources MQSeries & Oracle. I works perfectly.
I think the problem is that when I try to make a transaction using 1 resource, the transaction manager is starting the resource twice. It's not identifying that it should use "1 phase commit".
How could I check that what I'm saying is true?. And, more important, how could I solve this problem.
TIA
Felipe -
2. Re: JCA 1.5 development
fjcarretero Jun 8, 2005 6:04 AM (in response to fjcarretero)Hi all again,
I have gone one step further. I have read some documentation "WebSphere MQ XA support and Tuxedo" where it saysIt is possible for WebSphere MQ on Windows and UNIX systems to block
Tuxedo-coordinated XA applications indefinitely in xa_start. This can occur only
when two or more processes coordinated by Tuxedo in a single global transaction
attempt to access WebSphere MQ using the same transaction branch ID, or XID. If
Tuxedo gives each process in the global transaction a different XID to use with
WebSphere MQ, this cannot occur.
To avoid the problem, configure each application in Tuxedo that will access
WebSphere MQ under a single global transaction ID (gtrid), within its own Tuxedo
server group. Processes in the same server group use the same XID when accessing
resource managers on behalf of a single gtrid, and are therefore vulnerable to
blocking in xa_start in WebSphere MQ. Processes in different server groups use
separate XIDs when accessing resource managers and so will not have to worry
about serializing their transaction work in WebSphere MQ.
I have seen the following in the TransactionManagerImpl.enlistResource() code:// The xaRes is new. We register the xaRes with the Xid // that the RM has previously seen from this transaction, // and note that it has the same RM. resource = addResource(xaRes, resource.getXid(), resource); return resource.startResource();
How could I avoid this problem.
TIA
Felipe