Nothing big, but shouldn't we have some consistency in deployer object names (or ObjectNames in general) ?
I know we can get them from MainDeployer.listDeployers(), still I think it would make sense to put them all under "jboss.deployer" or include a "type=deployer" in their name, so they can be queried:
.war deployer no doubt has the most misleading name.
(a more interesting approach would be to use month names, April, July, etc. or even numbers Deployer1, Deployer2... :)
Yes, but the big problem is it breaks any existing depends. If we had an alias notion and the ability to use the alias as the depends target value I would have fewer qualms about changing the service names.