-
1. Re: Explicit depends tag on the bean definitions for the dep
Ages ago :-) we added inputs/outputs which naturally order the deployers for a certain stage.
I think MarkN just added deployers user guide section in the docs:
- http://labs.jboss.com/files/jbossmc/docs/2.0.x/userGuide/index.html
Check those for more details.
Or see my MC presentation from Zurich JUG:
- http://anonsvn.jboss.org/repos/jbossas/projects/presentations/trunk/microcontainer/
So, if you ask me, drop it. :-) -
2. Re: Explicit depends tag on the bean definitions for the dep
I know about the setInputs and setOutputs methods added into the deployers. But where do these methods indicate that they will handle dependency? ;)
I was of the impression that these methods handled the metadata type passed to the deployer and the type of the attachment as output.
I will take a look at your MC presentation. :)
I will scan the files for depends tags next week and remove them. :) -
3. Re: Explicit depends tag on the bean definitions for the dep
"anil.saldhana@jboss.com" wrote:
But where do these methods indicate that they will handle dependency? ;)
In the initial deployers design forum post for sure. ;-)
If there is no such (simple) indication in the code/javadocs, then we should definitely add a note.
They don't handle generic dependency, but this is somehow equivalent to depends dependency. It's just that the info is much more natural + being already present also helps. :-)"anil.saldhana@jboss.com" wrote:
I was of the impression that these methods handled the metadata type passed to the deployer and the type of the attachment as output.
That too. ;-)