-
15. Re: JBAOP-87 - Annotation Dependencies
"adrian@jboss.org" wrote:
I think it will be a good idea to make the MC annotation xml more free format.
I will have a stab at this today, but am leaving for holidays tonight. Can I change the AnnotationMetaData to only be compatible with the 2.0 schema? I think that is the path I will be taking, and if I get it working I'll mail you the diffs to make sure I don't screw anything up in case we still need to support the 1.0 schema.
In case I was not clear earlier, the aop->container part has been done and the proxies now support annotationType() + default values are populated if javassist is on the classpath. -
16. Re: JBAOP-87 - Annotation Dependencies
I have made the metadata more freeform. Although, there were references to annotations in the bean-deployer_1_0.xsd, I could only find that they were being used from the BeanSchemaBinding20?
I have updated the bean-deployer_2_0.xsd, but left the bean-deployer_1_0.xsd alone since I don't have the full picture of that. I've modified the code and tests in the aop-mc-int and container modules to use the new annotation metadata, I hope it is what you had in mind.
Since I am going to be away for the next ten days I have tagged the aop-mc-int and container modules with
"before_freeform_annotation_metadata" before this commit so you can easily roll back my changes if I have done the wrong thing. -
17. Re: JBAOP-87 - Annotation Dependencies
"kabir.khan@jboss.com" wrote:
I have updated the bean-deployer_2_0.xsd, but left the bean-deployer_1_0.xsd alone since I don't have the full picture of that.
That's OK. JBossMC-1.0.x did not support annotations.