This content has been marked as final.
Show 2 replies
-
1. Re: Need to revisit some other AOP integration
kabirkhan Aug 15, 2007 10:38 AM (in response to adrian.brock)aop + aop-mc-int should be pretty stable.
Could we do something like the following?
1) expose Property-/AbstractConfiguration as a bean, with settable JoinpointFactoryBuilder and DependencyBuilder properties
2) declare the AOP flavours of JFB and DB as beans, which then are installed and override the ones in AbstractConfiguration. This would replace the first part of the hack.
I am not sure where the AOPBeansSchemaInitializer was initialised in the "old" config? -
2. Re: Need to revisit some other AOP integration
adrian.brock Aug 16, 2007 6:59 AM (in response to adrian.brock)"kabir.khan@jboss.com" wrote:
aop + aop-mc-int should be pretty stable.
Could we do something like the following?
1) expose Property-/AbstractConfiguration as a bean, with settable JoinpointFactoryBuilder and DependencyBuilder properties
2) declare the AOP flavours of JFB and DB as beans, which then are installed and override the ones in AbstractConfiguration. This would replace the first part of the hack.
Only if there was a permission to change it, otherwise somebody could break the whole
system by setting a broken builder (Denial of Service Attack).
I am not sure where the AOPBeansSchemaInitializer was initialised in the "old" config?
In the JBossXB project inside the Singleton resolver.
But it ignores class names that it cannot find from the JBossXB classloader.