-
1. Re: xdoclet libraries
beware this one is used by JBoss modules as well, I would prefer check in a new version of xdoclet thirdparty somewhere else.
I'll do this -
2. Re: xdoclet libraries
yeah - i'm aware - i checked out "jboss-head" last night and ran the test suite against the current version of xdoclet, and was going to re-run against the new version this morning.
if you're going to check in elsewhere, that's just as good (and would be a lot quicker).
i've got the necessary changes ready to commit as soon as this is done. do you have an approximate eta? -
3. Re: xdoclet libraries
if it runs fine for jboss-head, ask Scott Stark if you can and you could update these instead.
-
4. Re: xdoclet libraries
the first pass at this didn't seem to work. the test results produced using xdoclet 1.2.1 did not match up w/ the results from the current version.
i'm going give this another run through just to make sure i didn't mess anything up.
i remember a while back you were considerring having a seperate thirdparty directory for nukes entirely, perhaps that may be the better way to go in general? -
5. Re: xdoclet libraries
yes, so let's switch on a private thirdparty to avoid to messup the jboss-head, I am gonna checkin xdoclet today later
-
6. Re: xdoclet libraries
ok - cool. i'm still going to give it one more shot on my end against the jboss-head and at least report back my findings.
-
-