-
1. Re: The suspense is killing me...
acoliver Nov 29, 2006 8:26 PM (in response to sappenin)sent you an email.
-
2. Re: The suspense is killing me...
acoliver Nov 29, 2006 8:28 PM (in response to sappenin)Oh and my filestore code is much more interesting. Not that IMAP isn't important...but the filestore stuff is a massive improvement over hypersonic which means we're getting a lot closer to all GUI/webstart production-able installs.
-
3. Re: The suspense is killing me...
sappenin Nov 30, 2006 9:44 PM (in response to sappenin)The filestore stuff is *very* interesting on a number of fronts. Most fascinating of all (in my mind) is an idea I've been thinking about lately to store JBMS back-end data onto Amazon's S3 service (www.amazon.com/aws) via a filesystem interface like JungleDisk or something similar. It would be a cool way to host a JBMS service on a large scale without having to worry about huge amounts of back-end storage.
The catch is that AWS is not POSIX compliant (aws can't guarantee certain things that a normal filesystem would). I'd be curious to do some testing on this, though....also to hear thoughts about whether such a setup could even work or not. -
4. Re: The suspense is killing me...
sappenin Dec 1, 2006 7:33 PM (in response to sappenin)Andy,
Got your mail and sent you a response.
Do you have any idea how fast the filestore code [could be]/[will be] as compared to a Postgres dbase-backed mail store, especially in a large scale implementation?
For larger email providers, it seems like a SAN would be employed (whether with a filestore or a db store). Does the database add anything beneficial in such a scenario (for typical mail operations). Or, would it make sense to employ some kind of hybrid (mail messages on the FileSys, Calendaring/User data in the DB)?
David -
5. Re: The suspense is killing me...
acoliver Dec 1, 2006 8:03 PM (in response to sappenin)At the moment mailboxes are in the DB and the filestore keeps body parts only. I haven't done any benchmarking vs Postgresql specifically but for single server installations I suspect it will exceed postgresql performance if only because it doesn't copy the mail parts around in memory like PG.
-
6. Re: The suspense is killing me...
acoliver Dec 1, 2006 8:55 PM (in response to sappenin)(note that this is configurable, we intend to continue to support DB stores too)