This content has been marked as final.
Show 2 replies
-
1. Re: jBoss 3.x slower than jBoss 2.x?
adrian.brock Aug 15, 2003 8:59 AM (in response to oravecz)It didn't support in-VM optimizations in your example.
It did some extra work to spot the class cast and
reverted to RMI semantics.
Are you using PortableRemoteObject.narrow() for the remote
home? Are you using the ByValueInvoker?
Regards,
Adrian -
2. Re: jBoss 3.x slower than jBoss 2.x?
oravecz Aug 16, 2003 9:56 AM (in response to oravecz)Yes, in 3.2 the only way to get my packaging to work is to use the ByValueInvoker. I use PRO in both examples.
It was also necessary to comment back in the localhost provider in jndi.properties.
It would be cool to include, or document all the steps necessary to create a new configuration called 'compatible'. In this configuration, users would be able to drop their 2.x deployments into.