-
1. Re: JBossMQ and NAT (Network Address Translation)
hchirino Nov 18, 2001 10:03 PM (in response to rverch)Did not understand the question.
-
2. Re: JBossMQ and NAT (Network Address Translation)
oshyosh Nov 27, 2001 2:06 PM (in response to rverch)I am also very puzzled by this question.
Take for instance cable modems (usually use dynamic IP)
Case Scenario:
Household 1 has a router having public IP
behind this router is >= 2 host machines
Host machines have a local subnet IP 192.168.#.#
Household 2: identical to Household 1 but, of course a
different house
A = a host machine from Household 1
B = a host machine from Household 2
C = a host having a public IP (not shared)
Let's start from the base of my confusion:
can A create a socket connection with B?
What are the possible ways these 2 hosts can send
messages to each other?
A can see C, but C can't see A?
A & B can't see each other?
And at the top of the pyramid:
Is it possible for A to send an asyncronous message
to B using JBossMQ? Explain please.
how about A & B talking directly to each other bypassing a central server if both hosts are connected to the Internet. If this would work it would save a lot of strain on the central server (C)
I hope the response to this clears a lot of confusion others may share with me.
I'll leave firewalls for another time.
Please, someone clear our confusion!
Josh