-
1. Re: Jboss3.0beta JMS Jdbc persistence (Oracle) not using jaw
hchirino Apr 2, 2002 9:18 AM (in response to hackerdude)Try checking out the latest version out of CVS. It has brand new JDBC Persistence Manager. All the SQL statements are configurable and it should also provide better performance. It just needs a little testing to make sure that it work with something other than HSQL.
Regards,
Hiram -
2. Re: Jboss3.0beta JMS Jdbc persistence (Oracle) not using jaw
sidney May 7, 2002 12:10 PM (in response to hackerdude)Hi,
i noticed the getTables method of the DatabaseMetaData class is used to check if the tables are there. For oracle you need to use uppercase table names to find them. You can set the names of the table in the conf/jbossmq-service.xml file. -
3. Re: Jboss3.0beta JMS Jdbc persistence (Oracle) not using jaw
asauve May 13, 2002 9:29 AM (in response to hackerdude)Can someone explain in rather granular steps the process to have JMS using Oracle as the persistence store... I have Oracle storing the entity beans, by using the examples in the distribution, but I have no success in setting up the JMS persistence... What should be the value of the DataSource attribute??? I would really appreciate any help with this matter... Tx
Alex -
4. Re: Jboss3.0beta JMS Jdbc persistence (Oracle) not using jaw
asauve May 13, 2002 1:05 PM (in response to hackerdude)I have JMS trying to write to the Oracle DS but as hackerdude has found the tables cannot be created... But if you grab the latest in the cvs load, the version number is 3.1, is 3.0 not being released??? I guess I will have to wait for 3.0 release but will it include the jdbc2 fix mentioned here? RC2 uses the jdbc, by default I am not really sure if jdbc2 is available on that load... I really have to persist to the Oracle DS, so if you can help THANK YOU!!!!
Alex -
5. Re: Jboss3.0beta JMS Jdbc persistence (Oracle) not using jaw
hchirino May 13, 2002 6:45 PM (in response to hackerdude)The next release of CVS HEAD will be 3.1 because the CVS has allready been branched at tag Branch_3_0. Rleases of the Branch_3_0 will be 3.0.x releases.
But fear not, I'm keeping the Branch_3_0 and the HEAD branch in synch, so all the features in head are currently in the 3_0 branch also.
Regards,
Hiram