This content has been marked as final. 
    
Show                 2 replies
    
- 
        1. Re: DB JMS performancegenman May 5, 2006 10:27 AM (in response to pixel)
 That's JMS for you, it mostly comes down to I/O bottlenecks.
 You might get better results from MySQL, especially if it is located on the same machine. Oracle is traditionally hard to tune (IMHO) unless you have a Oracle expert.
- 
        2. Re: DB JMS performancepixel May 5, 2006 10:57 AM (in response to pixel)thanks genman, I'm currently in the process of switching to OCI instead of the thin driver; some fairly derogatory comments towards the lineage of the thin driver suggested the switch might help. 
 After that I'll try MySQL - the price is certainly better
 
    