-
1. Re: new code is in
squirest Feb 27, 2002 9:22 AM (in response to squirest)Guys,
I'm making good progress. In fact, I'm totally wetting myself over how cool the XMBeans/Interceptors stuff is looking, especially WRT how it would work in a different implementation of a JMX agent.
One thing that will appear shortly is our first agent-implementation specific MBean (other than the MBeanServerDelegate). I'm ok to keep it in the JMImplementation domain still right?
Trev -
2. Re: new code is in
adrian.brock Feb 27, 2002 9:38 AM (in response to squirest)I was wondering this.
Juha has defined a JBOSSMX_DOMAIN in
org.jboss.mx.service.ServiceConstants
That domain isn't protected from register/unregister
like JMImplementation.
Regards,
Adrian -
3. Re: new code is in
juha Feb 27, 2002 10:53 AM (in response to squirest)the difference between JBOSSMX domain and JMIMPLEMENTATION domain:
1) use JMIMPLEMENTATION if you have an MBean that is meant for the internal use of the JBossMX server only; that is the MBean will never be needed on any other system, relies on implementation details of the JBossMX server and would not work anywhere else
2) use JBOSSMX domain in case you have a support MBeans you want to register into a known namespace. For instance, if an XMBean or Interceptor MBeans need to register support components you can use JBOSSMX domain that continues to work even if the host server is not JBossMX. For example, the persistence interceptor for XMBean registers a Timer MBean in JBOSSMX domain that it uses to get notifications for OnTimer persistence policy.
-- Juha -
4. Re: new code is in
squirest Feb 27, 2002 11:21 AM (in response to squirest)Cool, cool. This is great.
Trev -
5. Re: new code is in
davidjencks Feb 27, 2002 11:28 AM (in response to squirest)Am I missing something or is very little of the modelmbean descriptor implementation actually written? I've modified xmbean to work with the updated dtd I've been working on, and the user bean loads ok, but I can't set any values on it, I get NYI errors from ModelMBeanInfoSupport.setDescriptor. (I've added lots more descriptors using the xdoclet generator I'm working on in parallel). Is there anything especially tricky about writing this apparently missing code?
I'm seeing invocations go through OLDMBeanInvoker. Is this still expected?
I've just suggested on the main dev list that jboss use the xdoclet @todo tags to keep track of whats to do. I think this would be especially valuable for jbossmx. Any opinions? -
6. Re: new code is in
squirest Feb 27, 2002 11:29 AM (in response to squirest)Everyone is waiting on me David so there's a lot of NYIs hanging around.
It's coming really.
Trev -
7. Re: new code is in
juha Mar 1, 2002 2:55 AM (in response to squirest)waiting, waiting, waiting....
-- Juha