-
1. Re: building jboss-mx under windows from HEAD
adrian.brock Aug 21, 2002 11:41 AM (in response to cspakler)It looks like the standalone build.xml
hasn't been kept in step with the build system
changes (buildmagic or ant I'm not sure which).
This is the standalone version
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/jboss/build/jbossmx/build.xml
This is the version included with jboss-all
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/jboss/jmx/build.xml
You could try the jboss-all version (not sure if
it would work?) or look for changes made by
user57 and fbrier
Raise it as a bug or provide a patch,
it will need fixing before the jbossmx 1.1 release.
Regards,
Adrian -
2. Re: building jboss-mx under windows from HEAD
juha Aug 21, 2002 8:37 PM (in response to cspakler)btw wanna create 1.0.1 release with the serialization fixes?
-- Juha -
3. Re: building jboss-mx under windows from HEAD
adrian.brock Aug 22, 2002 6:43 AM (in response to cspakler)Sure.
I don't think there's much left to do for 1.1
compliance is there?
classloader repository
(this is probably the hardest WRT ULR)
mbean server permission
dynmanic mbean + standard mbean = dynamic mbean
fix the bug with the MMB constructorinfo type/role
fix "default" for a MMB attribute descriptor
anything else?
the openmbeans are optional in the spec,
I still need to finish them...
Regards,
Adrian -
4. Re: building jboss-mx under windows from HEAD
juha Aug 22, 2002 12:33 PM (in response to cspakler)don't worry about jmx 1.1, its mostly crap anyway, we will finish jmx 1.1 for jbossmx 1.2 release
-
5. Re: building jboss-mx under windows from HEAD
marc.fleury Aug 22, 2002 9:20 PM (in response to cspakler)now now,
we don't say a SUN spec is crap, we say it needs working on, plus we love this spec don't we