-
1. Re: Connecting with JSR160 compliant tool
abalan Aug 3, 2004 6:23 PM (in response to greydeath)MC4J Management Console does not support remoting for jboss.
see the requirements section in http://mc4j.sourceforge.net/usageJBoss.html -
2. Re: Connecting with JSR160 compliant tool
greydeath Aug 4, 2004 3:12 AM (in response to greydeath)That should not matter if both use the JMX Remote Interface --> JSR160.
This is the defined standard and Jboss ought to support that. Does it not? -
3. Re: Connecting with JSR160 compliant tool
starksm64 Aug 4, 2004 9:27 AM (in response to greydeath)jsr160 is not required by j2ee 1.4 and so it has not been implemented yet. The referenced page: http://mc4j.sourceforge.net/usageJBoss.html says it works with 3.2 and if it does, the same url would be used. This page incorrectly states that the RMIAdaptor location is not "jmx/rmi/RMIAdaptor". This is the location in 4.0.0RC1.
-
4. Re: Connecting with JSR160 compliant tool
greydeath Aug 4, 2004 9:42 AM (in response to greydeath)Thanks for the clarification. From some other forum entries I got the impression that this would be included in 4.0
Any Idea when or if this will be implemented?
Mike -
5. Re: Connecting with JSR160 compliant tool
starksm64 Aug 4, 2004 9:50 AM (in response to greydeath)If = yes, when = after 4.0.0.
-
6. Re: Connecting with JSR160 compliant tool
ghinkl Aug 16, 2004 10:38 AM (in response to greydeath)"scott.stark@jboss.org" wrote:
jsr160 is not required by j2ee 1.4 and so it has not been implemented yet. The referenced page: http://mc4j.sourceforge.net/usageJBoss.html says it works with 3.2 and if it does, the same url would be used. This page incorrectly states that the RMIAdaptor location is not "jmx/rmi/RMIAdaptor". This is the location in 4.0.0RC1.
I think it might have been changed temporarily with the DR releases. Though it does seem to be back to the original in the RC release. I will update that page accordingly.