-
1. Re: HASessionState/HAPartition not bound
slaboure Jun 5, 2003 4:55 AM (in response to topping)can you not simply add the clustering features to "default"? Is that really a big overhead. I don't think the error should be transformed in a warning: you explicitly ask for clustering but do not activate it. Will think about it though.
thanks for the feedback.
Cheers,
sacha -
2. Re: HASessionState/HAPartition not bound
topping Jun 6, 2003 12:32 AM (in response to topping)Hi Sacha,
Thanks for your response. The issue with overhead might have made more sense if I said "boot overhead". When restarting JBoss during development, the time for HA discovery is somewhat of a drag on the cycle. This is the reason for the request.
I defer to your opinion on the matter, but being able to configure whether the error is treated as a warning in the JMX config would make this workable for both camps.
If others don't need this now, is it because they are just accepting the additional boot time? It would be selfish to have you add this just for me, but it seems like most developers do anything they can to minimize the edit-compile-launch cycle. Seconds here and there add up to minutes and hours over the course of a week... hours that could be used for beer by the time Friday rolls around :-)
thanks, have a good Friday!
-b -
3. Re: HASessionState/HAPartition not bound
slaboure Jun 8, 2003 9:14 AM (in response to topping)OK, so that I don't forget to think about it, can you add this as a feature request on sf.net/projects/jboss and assign it to me (slaboure). Thank you.
Cheers,
sacha