-
1. Re: JBoss clustering question
juha Sep 26, 2003 5:30 AM (in response to rafcio)Each JBoss node should have its own embedded web container.
-- Juha -
2. Re: JBoss clustering question
rafcio Sep 26, 2003 5:48 AM (in response to rafcio)> Each JBoss node should have its own embedded web
> container.
Why is this the best solution?
Rafal -
3. Re: JBoss clustering question
juha Sep 26, 2003 6:13 AM (in response to rafcio)You avoid the very expensive serialization that you get between web tier and EJB tier if you separate your web container.
You can continue to use integrated security manager which makes your development slightly easier.
You get better utilization of your hardware if all nodes can respond to both web and EJB invocations (and with a homogeneous deployment you can always invoke locally which is what you want to do as much as possible, goes back to point 1).
-- Juha -
4. Re: JBoss clustering question
rafcio Sep 26, 2003 6:23 AM (in response to rafcio)> You avoid the very expensive serialization that you
> get between web tier and EJB tier if you separate
> your web container.
>
> You can continue to use integrated security manager
> which makes your development slightly easier.
>
> You get better utilization of your hardware if all
> nodes can respond to both web and EJB invocations
> (and with a homogeneous deployment you can always
> invoke locally which is what you want to do as much
> as possible, goes back to point 1).
o.k. we would than take Apache webserver with mod_jk load balancer at the front which will forward our calls to one JBoss node in our cluster. Need we than HA-JNDI if we have only local interfaces? Cause we are working local and we use only JNDI.
Rafal -
5. Re: JBoss clustering question
juha Sep 27, 2003 7:58 AM (in response to rafcio)As far as I can tell if you're using apache to load balance to web tier and then to stateless sessions you will not need HA-JNDI.
-- Juha -