-
1. Re: EJB 2.1 DD not supported?
davidjencks May 4, 2003 9:58 PM (in response to kbirch)Hi Kevin,
There are 2 problems right now:
1. the only kind of mdb you can deploy is a jms MessageListener. I have to change the mdb deployment code to use a dynamic proxy like the other bean types do. I misread the jca 1.5 spec originally :-((
2. a ejb 2.1 dd for an mdb is not processed at all. Personally I think the metadata handling will need a pretty much complete replacement but no one has started on this.
However... if you are trying to deploy a jms message listener and only need to set up the ActivationSpec for it, you can follow the example of the jca 1.5 test adapter. Also, deploy the mdb using the ejb 2.0 dd. The activationspec configuration will find the mdb from the jndi name.
In the future the activation spec part of this should be generated from the ejb 2.1 dd. -
2. Re: EJB 2.1 DD not supported?
kbirch May 5, 2003 9:17 AM (in response to kbirch)Are items 1 and 2 planned for a version 4 release?
What I want to do is to have an MDB that is a JMS message listener, but not driven by the container. I have my own inbound RA that will pass JMS messages to it.
How can I configure the MDB's DD so that the container won't pass it JMS messages? -
3. Re: EJB 2.1 DD not supported?
kbirch May 5, 2003 9:20 AM (in response to kbirch)Are items 1 and 2 planned for version 4?
What I want to do is have an MDB that is a JMS message listener, but receives its messages from an inbound RA, and not from the container. How would I write the MDB's DD to reflect this without support for EJB 2.1?
thanks,
kevin -
4. Re: EJB 2.1 DD not supported?
kbirch May 5, 2003 9:39 AM (in response to kbirch)testing 1... 2... 3...
-
5. Re: EJB 2.1 DD not supported?
kbirch May 5, 2003 9:40 AM (in response to kbirch)testing 1... 2... 3...
-
6. Re: EJB 2.1 DD not supported?
kbirch May 5, 2003 9:41 AM (in response to kbirch)testing, are my replies getting posted?