- 
        1. Re: Do we have a problem with Synchronous channel?timfox Oct 27, 2006 3:22 AM (in response to clebert.suconic)Clebert- 
 There were some problems with sync in alpha1 - are you working from that codebase?
- 
        2. Re: Do we have a problem with Synchronous channel?timfox Oct 27, 2006 3:25 AM (in response to clebert.suconic)I would definitely recommend resynching your branch with trunk 
- 
        3. Re: Do we have a problem with Synchronous channel?clebert.suconic Oct 27, 2006 10:43 AM (in response to clebert.suconic)I already did a resync on trunk on my branch... 
 I also did a test directly on trunk and got the same problem.
- 
        4. Re: Do we have a problem with Synchronous channel?timfox Oct 27, 2006 10:45 AM (in response to clebert.suconic)State is only enabled on the sync channel. 
 Why are you trying to get state via the async channel?
- 
        5. Re: Do we have a problem with Synchronous channel?clebert.suconic Oct 27, 2006 10:48 AM (in response to clebert.suconic)"timfox" wrote: 
 State is only enabled on the sync channel.
 Why are you trying to get state via the async channel?
 I'm not...
 I only said the the async channel seems to be working on my environment. Anything sent to the sync channel is being lost.
- 
        6. Re: Do we have a problem with Synchronous channel?timfox Oct 27, 2006 10:50 AM (in response to clebert.suconic)Do the clustering tests in the test suite run for you? 
- 
        7. Re: Do we have a problem with Synchronous channel?clebert.suconic Oct 27, 2006 10:50 AM (in response to clebert.suconic)I also said getState seemed to be working fine through synchronous channel. 
 But not sending messages.
- 
        8. Re: Do we have a problem with Synchronous channel?clebert.suconic Oct 27, 2006 12:45 PM (in response to clebert.suconic)It's a configuration problem on my Linux... 
 I thought it was a merge problem on my trunk
 Thanks a lot
 Clebert
- 
        9. Re: Do we have a problem with Synchronous channel?clebert.suconic Oct 27, 2006 2:19 PM (in response to clebert.suconic)Just in case an user ever search this thread: 
 The solution is here:
 http://www.jgroups.org/javagroupsnew/docs/manual/html/ch03.html#ItDoesntWork
 
    