-
1. Re: Getting the Address from QueueImpl?
ataylor Jan 7, 2009 3:55 AM (in response to clebert.suconic)I'm not sure that makes sense. a queue will belong to a binding which may be associated with many addresses.
-
2. Re: Getting the Address from QueueImpl?
timfox Jan 7, 2009 5:36 AM (in response to clebert.suconic)"ataylor" wrote:
I'm not sure that makes sense. a queue will belong to a binding which may be associated with many addresses.
+1, certainly in the future we may exploit that. -
3. Re: Getting the Address from QueueImpl?
timfox Jan 7, 2009 5:38 AM (in response to clebert.suconic)Hmm, can't you just prompt a depage as normal?
-
4. Re: Getting the Address from QueueImpl?
timfox Jan 7, 2009 5:40 AM (in response to clebert.suconic)Sounds like you're already implementing one of the solutions we discussed.
However, I'm not sure we decided on that solution (keep depaging until the reference is found).
Like I said yesterday, please *discuss* before jumping in with solutions.
The depage solution can lead to OOM and may not be desirable. The other solutions we discussed were maintaining ordering. -
5. Re: Getting the Address from QueueImpl?
timfox Jan 7, 2009 5:55 AM (in response to clebert.suconic)If you're looking at closng the remaining paging and large message replication issues, can you start by outlining the issues on this forum (you can start a new thread) and we can decide on the best solution.
IIRC the oustanding issues are
1) Large message replication. You added some custom replication that I thought was unnecessary. This needs to be looked at again
2) Replication with paging messages.
Anything else? -
6. Re: Getting the Address from QueueImpl?
clebert.suconic Jan 7, 2009 8:27 AM (in response to clebert.suconic)"timfox" wrote:
Sounds like you're already implementing one of the solutions we discussed.
However, I'm not sure we decided on that solution (keep depaging until the reference is found).
Like I said yesterday, please *discuss* before jumping in with solutions.
The depage solution can lead to OOM and may not be desirable. The other solutions we discussed were maintaining ordering.
No.. I didn' t implement it... but I was looking for how I would implement it.
I was sketching my design... and that would be the basic need to implement what we discussed before.