Beta4 version number was not incremented

[timfox]

The release version number in jbossmessaging-version.properties was not incremented from beta3 to beta4, they both use the same value 104. :(

This means the version check code is now useless, and the server will allow b3 and b4 clients and servers to try to connect, and all sorts of weird things to happen, and it makes it difficult to track down errors related to different versions of clients and servers.

It's very important the version number is incremented on each release.

[timfox]

Compare:

http://anonsvn.jboss.org/repos/messaging/tags/JBossMessaging_2_0_0_Beta3/src/config/common/version.properties

http://anonsvn.jboss.org/repos/messaging/tags/JBossMessaging_2_0_0_Beta4/src/config/common/jboss-messaging-version.properties

Also, the version name was not changed. This must be changed too!!

[jmesnil]

"timfox" wrote:
The release version number in jbossmessaging-version.properties was not incremented from beta3 to beta4, they both use the same value 104. :(

It's very important the version number is incremented on each release.

my bad: I thought the incrementingVersion was a kind of qualifier version[1].
In fact, it is the *protocol* version. I've updated the release check list to ensure we do not forget to increment it next time.

[1] http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/Version_Numbering

[jmesnil]

"timfox" wrote:
Compare:

http://anonsvn.jboss.org/repos/messaging/tags/JBossMessaging_2_0_0_Beta3/src/config/common/version.properties

http://anonsvn.jboss.org/repos/messaging/tags/JBossMessaging_2_0_0_Beta4/src/config/common/jboss-messaging-version.properties

Also, the version name was not changed. This must be changed too!!

Do we have to change the version name between beta releases?
What's the use of the version name?

[timfox]

"jmesnil" wrote:

Do we have to change the version name between beta releases?

Yes it gets changed on each release

What's the use of the version name?

It's just the code name for the release.