FD vs FD_SOCK

[brian.stansberry]

We are not consistent in our usage of FD vs. FD_SOCK. In cluster-service.xml, we are using FD. In tc5-cluster.sar we are using FD_SOCK. Is there any reason for this? I think we should pick one or the other.

Given http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JGRP-195, which won't be fixed until 2.3, I think we should go with FD.

[belaban]

Can't access JIRA, but JGRP-195 won't matter; I'm suggesting a config which includes FD_SOCK by default, starting with 2.3, but also adds FD with a higher timeout (ca. 5 mins) as second line of defense

[brian.stansberry]

Sounds good, but for 4.0.4, which will be stuck on 2.2.7, I think we should use FD.

[belaban]

+1

[brian.stansberry]

Added

http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-3003 (for 4.0.4)

and

http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-3004 for once 2.3 is out.