-
1. Re: Howto use RichFaces 3.1.0 with trinidad 1.2.1?
hgf Sep 17, 2007 5:58 PM (in response to dxxvi)I'm also interested in this topic.
I want to use such simple components like tr:inputText because these components contains all in one what is needed for an input field in one: the input field, the output label, message handling, and so on. These kind of components does not exist yet in richFaces. Please correct me if I'm wrong.
I've spended about a day trying to make trinidad, richFaces and faclets work together. Without success. Hopfully there is someone who can give an answer to this topic.
Thank you -
2. Re: Howto use RichFaces 3.1.0 with trinidad 1.2.1?
supernovasoftware.com Sep 17, 2007 6:04 PM (in response to dxxvi)Check out the seamdiscs example in Seam 2.0. I used it to do my integration and it works well.
-
3. Re: Howto use RichFaces 3.1.0 with trinidad 1.2.1?
hgf Sep 18, 2007 7:22 AM (in response to dxxvi)Sorry, but I did not find this example in jboss-seam-2.0.0.BETA1. Can you please post the relevant config-files?
thank you -
4. Re: Howto use RichFaces 3.1.0 with trinidad 1.2.1?
hispeedsurfer Sep 18, 2007 8:36 AM (in response to dxxvi)as far as I know the seam-discs example exist only in Seam CVS Repository
have a look at
http://wiki.jboss.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=SeamRepository -
5. Re: Howto use RichFaces 3.1.0 with trinidad 1.2.1?
supernovasoftware.com Sep 18, 2007 9:53 AM (in response to dxxvi)I thought it was in the Beta. Seam 2.0 CR1 will be out any day as all bug have been resolved in jira.
If it is not in the beta you will have to either check out the CVS head or wait for CR1. -
6. Re: Howto use RichFaces 3.1.0 with trinidad 1.2.1?
hgf Sep 18, 2007 11:10 AM (in response to dxxvi)Thanks. I'll check this later.
I saw a few configs using trinidad combined with seam yesterday. I did not check them in more deatail because I don not use seam and it seems to me that it is not enough just to remove the seam entries. If it is so, what other entries do I have to insert?
What I'm looking for is just the configuration of the combination of richFaces, trinidad and facelets. I think that these combination could exist very often because of trinidad has what richFaces has not: tons of simple components.
regards