This is jboss-3.2.2.
I'm using a PostgreSQL data source, bound to "java:/PostgresDS" by postgres-ds.xml like this:
<local-tx-datasource>
<jndi-name>PostgresDS</jndi-name>
<connection-url>..blah..blah...</connection-url>
<driver-class>org.postgresql.Driver</driver-class>
<user-name>sbank</user-name>
sbank
</local-tx-datasource>
It works just fine when I use this name direcly in jbosscmp-jdbc.xml, like this:
java:/PostgresDS
<datasource-mapping>PostgreSQL</datasource-mapping>
However I would like to use something like "jdbc/SbankDS" in jbosscmp-jdbc.xml, and map it to "java:/PostgresDS" in jboss.xml like this:
...
<resource-managers>
<resource-manager>
<res-name>jdbc/sbankDS</res-name>
<res-jndi-name>java:/PostgresDS</res-jndi-name>
</resource-manager>
</resource-managers>
However this does NOT work, it reports the following on deployment time:
org.jboss.deployment.DeploymentException: Error: can't find data source: jdbc/SbankDS; - nested throwable: (javax.naming.NameNotFoundException: jdbc not bound)
It doesn't seem to matter whether I use relative or absolute names.
So the question is: does the "resource-manager" work for this at all, or is the bean provider/assembler forced to use (in jbosscmp-jdbc.xml) the name specified in foo-ds.xml (as deployed by the admin).
Or maybe I misunderstand the roles completly? :-)
regards
Marcin
