injboss example problem

[milesif]

Hi everybody, (hope this is the right place to post)

I am using jdk1.5.0_03, Jboss4.0.2 in the ALL configuration where I installed ejb3 beta 1 and jboss portal . Ejb3 work perfect so I decided to make experiments to add my interceptors to my ejb and servlets. To start, I deployed the annotated-injboss example and I got the following results.

1. when I run "ant deploy-ear-aop" it is all fine, but I get the following message

Classes have not been aop'ed - run JBoss with enable transformations = true
[echo] Deploying ear containing a lib.aop file containing the jboss-aop.xml file

2. I thought it would be ok after restarting the server, but on restart I got the following output:

INFO [EARDeployer] Init J2EE application: file:/home/francescom/development/jboss-4.0.2/server/all/deploy/aopexample.ear
INFO [STDOUT] [debug] Looking for aspects in: org.jboss.injbossaop.lib.ExampleValue
INFO [STDOUT] [debug] Looking for aspects in: org.jboss.injbossaop.lib.SimpleInterceptor
INFO [STDOUT] [debug] Found @InterceptorDef in: org.jboss.injbossaop.lib.SimpleInterceptor
INFO [STDOUT] [debug] Looking for aspects in: org.jboss.injbossaop.web.BasicExampleServlet
INFO [STDOUT] [debug] Looking for aspects in: org.jboss.injbossaop.web.EarExampleServlet
INFO [AspectDeployer] Deployed AOP: file:/home/francescom/development/jboss-4.0.2/server/all/tmp/deploy/tmp23248aopexample.ear-contents/aopexamplelib.aop
INFO [EjbModule] Deploying ExampleSession
INFO [EJBDeployer] Deployed: file:/home/francescom/development/jboss-4.0.2/server/all/tmp/deploy/tmp23248aopexample.ear-contents/aopexampleejb.jar
INFO [TomcatDeployer] deploy, ctxPath=/aopexample, warUrl=file:/home/francescom/development/jboss-4.0.2/server/all/tmp/deploy/tmp23248aopexample.ear-contents/aopexample.war/
INFO [EARDeployer] Started J2EE application: file:/home/francescom/development/jboss-4.0.2/server/all/deploy/aopexample.ear

and when I connected to http://localhost:8080/aopexample/index.jsp I had the following results:

15:20:10,036 INFO [STDOUT] **** ExampleValue empty Constructor
15:20:10,043 INFO [STDOUT] **** ExampleValue.getMessage()
15:20:15,121 INFO [STDOUT] **** EarExampleServlet.service()
15:20:15,316 INFO [STDOUT] *** ExampleSessionBean.getValue()
15:20:15,317 INFO [STDOUT] **** ExampleValue String Constructor
15:20:15,318 INFO [STDOUT] **** ExampleValue String Constructor
15:20:15,377 INFO [STDOUT] **** ExampleValue.getMessage()

Neither ejbs nor servlets have been aop'ed. How is this possible if my ejbs3 work correctly (that should mean that transaction and security aspects has been succesfully installed).
What is it transformations = true ? Where can I set it ?

Thanks in advance for help
milesif

[kabirkhan]

http://docs.jboss.com/aop/1.3/aspect-framework/reference/en/html/running.html#jboss

EJB3 does not do bytecode weaving, it just uses AOP for configuration

[milesif]

Hi kabir,

I forgot to say that I already did what is indicated in section "10.3.3. JBoss 4.x and JDK 5" of manual, setting -javaagent:pluggable-instrumentor.jar and copying pluggable-instrumentor.jar in the bin directory. I also enabled loadtime weaving (not used by ejb3 as tou explained to me).

You mean I can never set my aspects for ejb3 ? or I can do that modifying configuration in the all/deploy/jboss-aop-jdk50.deployer/base-aop.xml file ?

Anyway note that in the annotated-injboss example there are no ejb3, but I can set aspects neither for servlets nor for ejbs 2. I do not think that ejb3 disable aop for other components. There must be something else I miss but I cannot see what.

Thanks a lot
Francesco Milesi

[kabirkhan]

Make sure that you have included org.jboss.injbossaop
in the Include attribute of the AspectManager service and that you are using AspectManagerServiceJDK5 as outlined here http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=66619

[milesif]

Hi Kabir,

I had already read the post you indicated, but I did not notice JDK5 at the and of AspectManagerService.

Sorry for wasting your time and thanks again.

Francesco

[kabirkhan]

Future versions will have more comments about this :-)