This content has been marked as final.
Show 4 replies
-
1. Re: JSR-196 [Java Authentication SPI for Containers] Discuss
anil.saldhana Mar 17, 2006 3:13 AM (in response to anil.saldhana)http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=79391
is the discussion on extending JSR-196 to EJB3 interceptors. -
2. Re: JSR-196 [Java Authentication SPI for Containers] Discuss
anil.saldhana Apr 6, 2006 5:39 PM (in response to anil.saldhana)An issue that needs consideration is whether the ServerAuthModules need to do some form of a handshake with the clientside. This exists in the GSS Style API, Ldap SASL and the following snip from Scott's reply says it further:
Yes, the handshake is a problem. How would digest auth be handled in the web container if all step were delegated to the jsr196 layer? SRP is another gss like protocol that has a multi-request handshake.
-
3. Re: JSR-196 [Java Authentication SPI for Containers] Discuss
anil.saldhana Jun 3, 2006 3:47 PM (in response to anil.saldhana)To consider JSR-196 for JMS, I see an issue:
There is no notion of a JMS message until you have a connection from a connectionfactory. Only when you are creating a connection, would you consider security.
http://java.sun.com/j2ee/1.4/docs/api/javax/jms/ConnectionFactory.htmlConnectionFactory cf = // Connection con = cf.createConnection(String username, String password); //No Message here Session sess = con.createSession(....); //Message will follow later and we have already authenticated
Since JSR-196 would require a message object while passing thru the auth modules, I am wondering whether JSR-196 can be applied to JMS. -
4. Re: JSR-196 [Java Authentication SPI for Containers] Discuss
techrams Apr 7, 2008 10:06 PM (in response to anil.saldhana)I see that last post has been a while back. Can we know what is the latest status of JSR-196 support in JBoss?