mapping of operation exposed via XMBean to method of differe

[tom.elrod]

When declaring an XMBean operation, is there any way possible to expose the operatoin using one name (i.e. start) and have it actually call a method of a different name (i.e. doMyStart()) on the target POJO?

I know the dtd does not support this (so is probably not possible), but was looking for something like:


The start lifecycle operation
start
doMyStart


Since the XMBean is really just a proxy to the target POJO (via Model MBean), this technically would be possible, correct?

[starksm64]

Its possible and can be done today with a custom interceptor on the xmbean. As far as I remeber we do not have direct support for operation name to method mapping like we do for the attributes.