-
1. Re: New JavaMail
mikezzz Aug 13, 2005 12:16 PM (in response to acoliver)I need to sit down and look at how the MimePartDataSource and the ContentInputStream components work. It would be nice to provide a memory efficient JavaMail interface backed by the stream store. Even if we replace JavaMail some third party components may prefer the JavaMail API. jASEN for spam filtering springs to mind.
Mike. -
2. Re: New JavaMail
acoliver Aug 13, 2005 2:21 PM (in response to acoliver)One thing is it seems like JM still uses JAF which totally synchronizes things all to hell. We may need to embrace and extend.
-
3. Re: New JavaMail
raffaeleguidi Aug 15, 2005 7:00 PM (in response to acoliver)Did you hear about "Ristretto", the JavaMail replacement from the columba mail client project (http://columba.sourceforge.net/)? It looks a viable alternative to JavaMail.
-
4. Re: New JavaMail
mikezzz Aug 16, 2005 12:27 PM (in response to acoliver)Nice spot!! Looks quite good. Bit closer to the metal which would be useful for us. You can actually get the error codes back from failed request, can't do that in JavaMail. The data() method appears to take an input stream which will play nice with our streaming API.
Mike. -
5. Re: New JavaMail
acoliver Aug 18, 2005 12:03 PM (in response to acoliver)If it will work then we can use it, it is MPL. I'd be happy about it too because we can actually fix any performance issues instead of petitioning some spec committee.
-
6. Re: New JavaMail
mikezzz Aug 18, 2005 4:30 PM (in response to acoliver)I am going to have a look at it for M4 when I try to fix JBMAIL-105.
-
7. Re: New JavaMail
raffaeleguidi Aug 22, 2005 7:27 PM (in response to acoliver)I knew you would have liked it ;)