[ben.wang]

Yes, with the latest proposal, I am going to allow it unless I see other problems. Originally, I propsed it is ok to have complex Serializable type but just not "aspectized" POJO that needs internall mapping.

[genman]

One small problem. What if the POJO is something like this:

public Singleton {
 static int i = 3;
 private Singleton() {}
 public int getI() { return i; }
}

I'm not sure how attach would work if you can't actually construct it. This might be something you don't need to support, but you might need some way to attach the class itself.

[ben.wang]

Yes, with the proposed approach, we will have to document that you will attach to be able to replicate the static fields; that means, you need an "aspectized" POJO instance.

[korimilli]

Is static field replication feature there in JBOSS Cache Release 2.0.0 CR3. I do see a staticFieldInterceptor class in the PojoCache.jar file. How do I use it?

If not, when will this feature (time frame) be avaialble.

[jason.greene]

That interceptor was left over from an incomplete experimental implementation.

Static field replication is currently planned for 2.1.0:
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBCACHE-726

-Jason