-
1. Re: Seam validation issues
akazakov Apr 15, 2009 12:24 PM (in response to pdhaigh)It seems you are using some early JBDS 2. Some beta or even alpha. Please update it to JBDS 2.0 GA (or JBoss Tools 3.0 GA). We have fixed all these bugs there.
-
2. Re: Seam validation issues
pdhaigh Apr 15, 2009 12:29 PM (in response to pdhaigh)Hi,
I am definately using the GA:
JBoss Developer Studio
Version: 2.0.0.GA
Build id: R200903141247-H4
Build date: 200903141316
And the version of JBoss Tools update site is:
JBoss Tools 3.0.0.GA-R200903141626-H5
The Seam bit is:
Seam Tools for Eclipse
Version: 3.0.0.GA-R200903141626-H5
any suggestions gratefully received.. -
3. Re: Seam validation issues
akazakov Apr 15, 2009 12:32 PM (in response to pdhaigh)Hm... I can't reproduce it in GA and I remeber these bugs in some beta...
Have you updated your JBDS from beta? -
4. Re: Seam validation issues
pdhaigh Apr 15, 2009 12:45 PM (in response to pdhaigh)Nope, clean install.
Same workbench folder as I had with JBDS v1 - can that have impact? -
5. Re: Seam validation issues
akazakov Apr 15, 2009 12:47 PM (in response to pdhaigh)It could... Have tried clean/build all your projects?
-
6. Re: Seam validation issues
pdhaigh Apr 15, 2009 12:51 PM (in response to pdhaigh)Yes, cleaned several times..
-
7. Re: Seam validation issues
akazakov Apr 15, 2009 12:55 PM (in response to pdhaigh)Could you create new Seam project and copy the problematic code there? Is the issue still reproducable there? If so could you report it to jira and attache that project.
-
8. Re: Seam validation issues
pdhaigh Apr 15, 2009 2:19 PM (in response to pdhaigh)That seemed ok - deleting all of the Eclipse meta files from my project (including .project) and then recreating the project seems to have resolved the issue.
Thanks for your help. -
9. Re: Seam validation issues
akazakov Apr 15, 2009 2:30 PM (in response to pdhaigh)Eclipse WTP seemed not to removed old problem markers from old workspace... We changed marker IDs for Seam problem. It could be a reason. But anyway WTP should have removed them...