Did "Group" become a reserved word in EJB3 persistance frame

[vincent_os]

Hello,
I recently updated my JBoss appserver with jboss-EJB-3.0 Preview 5 jars/libs. Since then I encountered the following problem:

I have a entity bean called "Group" when I try to deploy this simple bean (it contains two persistant String attributes and an id field). I get an error when the EJB3.jar is deployed

ERROR unexpected token GROUP ....

Now if I change may bean class name to say Groupz.java it deploys fine!

is this intended behavior?

[kabirkhan]

Can you post the stack trace please?

[epbernard]

Override the table name with backticks '
GROUP is a SQL reserved word.

[vincent_os]

OK, tried the following:

@Entity
@Table(name="MyGroup")
public class Group implements Serializable, Cloneable
{

I still get the follwing error:

6:58:08,912 ERROR [SchemaExport] Unsuccessful: create table Group (id integer generated by default as identity (start with 1), displayName varchar(255), description varchar(255), parentGroup_id integer, primary key (id))
16:58:08,912 ERROR [SchemaExport] Unexpected token: GROUP in statement [create table Group]

It seems that the annotation (@Table(name="MyGroup")) is not overriding the table name?

[epbernard]

You most likely made a mistake. I'm pretty sure it works.