"Kevin.Conner@jboss.com" wrote:"tfennelly" wrote:
Is the use of "Adapter" here not potentially confusing, since th .rar is an "Adapter" too? To me, this thing is performing a mapping operation, so how about "ActivationMapper"?
I'm easy, either is good to me. Not sure it would be confusing though :)
Okay, I have some spare time waiting on a support case so I will try out the following
- Create the interface as above, called Mapper rather than Adapter
- Create a JBoss default
- Move JmsListenerMapper across to this mechanism
- Add support for default in jbossesb-properties
- Allow override of mapper from listener/provider
- Add tests for supporting all this
Does this sound good?
Sounds perfect Kev!
+1
Great, thanks guys