This content has been marked as final.
Show 2 replies
-
1. Re: Testing, mock objects and ejb3 entity beans
bill.burke Nov 3, 2005 8:11 AM (in response to camross)interfaces cannot be used to define persistence...
BTW, mocks are unnecessary in EJB3, especially with JBoss Embedabble EJB 3.0. -
2. Re: Testing, mock objects and ejb3 entity beans
camross Nov 3, 2005 9:15 AM (in response to camross)Makes sense from a persistence perspective... So, EJB3 doesn't support an interface-based programming model for entity beans. I guess I was taking this concept of programming using POJOs too literally. Also, I'll have to consider using embedabble EJB 3.0 for my testing strategy.
Thanks much,
Cameron.