-
1. Re: Adding children that do not exist.
epbernard Apr 3, 2006 12:53 PM (in response to chornsey)Search the forum.
Use a Set which makes sense from a business perspective or
do not EAGER more than one Collection (ie bag semantic) per resultset: this is not conceptually possible -
2. Re: Adding children that do not exist.
chornsey Apr 3, 2006 1:09 PM (in response to chornsey)Thanks for the response, my searches have not provided much help.
Can you provide a search criteria that may be more fruitfull?
Thanks again -
3. Re: Adding children that do not exist.
chornsey Apr 5, 2006 10:20 AM (in response to chornsey)Can anyone provide more insight into this. Not using eager more than once is not possible in my scenario. I have not found other post which detail the problem in a way I can comprehend.
What other sets are you suggesting? Dont all sets use a bag semantic anyway. So how is using a set vs a list going to help?
Am I completly of base? -
4. Re: Adding children that do not exist.
chornsey Apr 5, 2006 10:28 AM (in response to chornsey)Nermind.
i found the post :
http://jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=76796
I am still confused though isnt a set still mapped with the same attributes as a list? How is this different than mapping a list?