ClassCastException on Stateless Session Bean
robert.geisler Mar 4, 2009 6:12 AMhello everybody,
currently we are migrating our EJB 2.1 (about 850 EJBs) to EJB 3.0. till now there have not been too many problems, but today i meet a special challeng when i migrated a Stateful Session Bean.
the SFSB, lets call it MyStatefulSessionBean implements a Remote Business Interface (MyStatefulSession) and gets deployed in a EAR (MyEAR.ear). from a standalone client i can lookup, cast and use the SFSB successfully.
otherwise we deploy a WAR, too. from there i can lookup the SFSB, but cannot use it, because casting results in ClassCastException:
Context context = ContextFactory.getInstance().getContext(); MyStatefulSession session = (MyStatefulSession) context.lookup("MyEAR/MyStatefulSession/remote");
$Proxy123 cannot be cast to xzy.MyStatefulSession
the MyStatefulSession.class is packaged in server/MyServer/lib/MyLibrary.jar and in our EAR, too.
i tried to remove all duplicate interfaces and classes from the EAR, but than i get java.lang.VerifyError -that i cannot understand- in arbitrary implementation classes (even in EJB 2.1 SLSB).
2009-03-04 11:48:41,837 WARN [org.jboss.ejb.EJBDeployer] Verify failed; continuing java.lang.VerifyError: (class: a/b/c/ArbitraryBean, method: getSomething signature: (Ljava/lang/String;ILx/y/z/SomeDTO;)Ljava/util/ArrayList;) Incompatible argument to function at java.lang.Class.getDeclaredMethods0(Native Method) at java.lang.Class.privateGetDeclaredMethods(Unknown Source) at java.lang.Class.privateGetPublicMethods(Unknown Source) at java.lang.Class.getMethods(Unknown Source) at org.jboss.verifier.strategy.AbstractVerifier.hasEJBCreateMethod(AbstractVerifier.java:687) at org.jboss.verifier.strategy.EJBVerifier21.verifySessionBean(EJBVerifier21.java:858)
my idea is that all classes and interfaces that will be used from EAR and WAR, should go to server/MyServer/lib/, implementation classes should remain in EAR, servlets should go into WAR.
is that right? if so, we have to refactor our ANT builds, i guess ; )
anyway... i wonder why our packaging strategy do not show any conflicts for Stateless Session Beans. maybe someone can help me with this...?
thanks in advance
robert