This content has been marked as final.
Show 2 replies
-
1. Re: EJB3 with plain RMI
starksm64 Mar 1, 2006 10:12 AM (in response to gruenewa)Because the rmi Naming service is not required by ejb3, has semantics different than JNDI, and the thing that looks like an RMI proxy/stub has to understand how to interact with security, user transactions, etc.
-
2. Re: EJB3 with plain RMI
gruenewa Mar 2, 2006 8:51 AM (in response to gruenewa)Thanks for your response.
Best regards,
Alexander