This content has been marked as final.
Show 4 replies
-
1. Re: New feature proposal: Add injection interceptor scoped d
c.vidal Sep 28, 2006 10:44 AM (in response to c.vidal)Something went wrong with the thread title, it was meant to be called:
New feature proposal: Add injection interceptor scoped default Spring bean factory JNDI name.
-
2. Re: New feature proposal: Add injection interceptor scoped d
alesj Oct 18, 2006 8:27 AM (in response to c.vidal)"c.vidal" wrote:
What do you think ?
I thought of that before. Did really have the time to implement it - as it should be.
A single default jndi name isn't ok - since once you deploy more that one SpringDeployer app - it would put all BeanFactories under the same jndi name - not what we want.
It should be more deployment specific - something similar to EJB3 stuff for persistence context - single persistence context doesn't reqiure unit name.
But working on it. -
3. Re: New feature proposal: Add injection interceptor scoped d
c.vidal Oct 18, 2006 8:43 AM (in response to c.vidal)"alesj" wrote:
A single default jndi name isn't ok - since once you deploy more that one SpringDeployer app - it would put all BeanFactories under the same jndi name - not what we want.
You're right, that's fine with me."alesj" wrote:
It should be more deployment specific - something similar to EJB3 stuff for persistence context - single persistence context doesn't reqiure unit name.
That would be great."alesj" wrote:
But working on to it.
Looking forward it ;)
Regards,
Cédric -
4. Re: New feature proposal: Add injection interceptor scoped d
alesj Oct 18, 2006 10:31 AM (in response to c.vidal)SpringDeployer compatible with Spring2.0 final.
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3979096