This content has been marked as final.
Show 4 replies
-
1. Re: fork node question
pedrosacosta Dec 13, 2005 12:05 PM (in response to pedrosacosta)
join1
------>|
fork1 | |-------> node1
------>|
-------^
fork2 |
------->|-------> node2
join2 -
2. Re: fork node question
pedrosacosta Dec 13, 2005 12:07 PM (in response to pedrosacosta)I'm sorry, but it's this post that ruins my workflow draw. I'll explain the workflow.
From fork1 exits two path of execution to join 1, and from fork 2 exits one path of execution to join1 and other to join2. -
3. Re: fork node question
sforema Dec 13, 2005 2:18 PM (in response to pedrosacosta)I've never considered having a join bring together two forks. I'm not sure it was intended to do that. It would be easy enough to try it out.
-
4. Re: fork node question
koen.aers Dec 14, 2005 2:33 AM (in response to pedrosacosta)Each fork should be used in relation to a corresponding join. Mixing parallel paths of execution between fork/join pairs will put you in trouble.
Regards,
Koen