This content has been marked as final.
Show 3 replies
-
1. Re: about implementation of JobExecutorThread
kukeltje Apr 17, 2008 11:00 AM (in response to swenker)why do you think it is only the latest job?
For me it is all jobs that have
- a specific lockowner or nolockowener
- more then 0 retries configured
- a due date that is in the past-
- are not suspended
so... -
2. Re: about implementation of JobExecutorThread
swenker Apr 17, 2008 9:04 PM (in response to swenker)oh,I am sorry , you know, the result retrieved from db has been limited to the first one within java method.
What I really mean is : how can we assure that the acquired one is due to be executed? -
3. Re: about implementation of JobExecutorThread
swenker Apr 18, 2008 4:09 AM (in response to swenker)I am understand this point now after noticing that the duedate 'value is a future time.