This content has been marked as final.
Show 3 replies
-
1. Re: Version 3.2 vs 4
bradsdavis Apr 18, 2009 9:12 AM (in response to sherrys)4 is in the works, but probably isnt enterprise ready quite yet. If you have a short time to market, I would say use 3.2x
-
2. Re: Version 3.2 vs 4
sherrys Apr 19, 2009 12:49 AM (in response to sherrys)Thanks a lot Bradsdavis, But what about the version 4 features? It seems that version 4 supports command-based services, database partitioning per process language, and specially full embeddability.
--Sherry -
3. Re: Version 3.2 vs 4
bradsdavis May 27, 2010 9:36 AM (in response to sherrys)Incase someone comes accross this, the features for jBPM 4 will be rolled into jBPM 5 based on user feedback. jBPM 3.2.x is the supported JBoss branch.