-
1. Re: ExpressionEvaluator
tom.baeyens Nov 28, 2007 10:03 AM (in response to pmuir)i don't think we can currently support this in jPDL 3. it would require big changes, including schema updates that will be forced to all our user base.
i do plan to make that separation in the next version of jPDL 4. -
2. Re: ExpressionEvaluator
tom.baeyens Nov 28, 2007 10:05 AM (in response to pmuir)at the time, i thought it was a cool thing that you didn't have to separate between value binding expressions and method binding expressions.
now i still think that is cool, but the compatibility with what people know of unified expressions wins over the coolness argument. -
3. Re: ExpressionEvaluator
pmuir Nov 28, 2007 10:14 AM (in response to pmuir)Yeah, it doesn't actually do any damage to the evaluation of the expressions, just means we can't throw the exceptions that people are used to with Unified EL. I was half way through a set of if-then-else statements to allow us throw a generic exception and log the possible specific exceptions so I will finish that off as a workaround for now.
Thanks :)