- 
        1. Re: jpdl schema filenamecamunda Apr 11, 2009 3:08 PM (in response to tom.baeyens)I would allow schema extensions in minor updates (4.1/4.2/...). Micro updates would be maybe too confusing? 
 So I would prefer jpdl4.1.xsd I guess.
- 
        2. Re: jpdl schema filenametom.baeyens Apr 13, 2009 3:41 AM (in response to tom.baeyens)that is what my gutt feeling says as well. but i recall that in jbpm 3 we also did some (compatible) updates in micro releases. 
 should we think about strickt rules. or just follow instinct to what kind of updates we can do ?
- 
        3. Re: jpdl schema filenamecamunda Apr 13, 2009 4:11 AM (in response to tom.baeyens)Being to restrictive can result in switching off the schema validation in order to improve stuff or use new features (seen that a lot in projects)... So personally I wouldn't have too big problems if there are backward compatible changes in the Schema in Micro-Versions. 
 And follow your instinct is never the worst idea :-)
- 
        4. Re: jpdl schema filenamejbarrez Apr 13, 2009 4:33 AM (in response to tom.baeyens)I agree, jpdl4.1.xsd is the best choce. As you say, there shouldn't be any xsd changed between micro releases 
 
     
    