This content has been marked as final.
Show 3 replies
-
1. Re: renaming signal to trigger ?
camunda Apr 17, 2009 4:34 AM (in response to tom.baeyens)I think I wouldn't do it. It should be documented, that the people are aware of it.
And trigger doesn't sound completly correct to me.
And jbpm 3 users know the signal, so the confusion is already there, better handle it by documentation would be my vote. -
2. Re: renaming signal to trigger ?
kukeltje Apr 17, 2009 4:56 AM (in response to tom.baeyens)I'm kind of ambivalent. Name clashes can occur and trying to prevent that can indeed lead to other issues/confusion etc. otoh, good documentation would also take 1/2 a day probably.
+1 for leaving it as it is and document it -
3. Re: renaming signal to trigger ?
tom.baeyens Apr 17, 2009 7:52 AM (in response to tom.baeyens)ok. i'll leave it as it is.