2 Replies Latest reply on Oct 20, 2005 8:40 AM by adrian.brock

    JBossXB as a project

      Hi Alex,

      How close are we to being able to do this?
      http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBBUILD-61

      I think such a project should serve as an integration point for everybody's xml needs
      where issues cannot be resolved through the JAXP api?

        • 1. Re: JBossXB as a project
          aloubyansky

          IMO, feature-wise the project is ready.
          What I would like to do before that step is:

          - http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBXB-37 (has been linked)

          - perhaps, http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBXB-36 also (has not been linked yet)

          - address packaging (http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=70841) and package name (sunday) issues

          If you would like to add something, link existing issues or create new ones.

          Also, let's discuss the priority of this task. I have WS XB-related issues to work on that are my top priority currently.

          • 2. Re: JBossXB as a project

            It is not urgent, but I would like to split up jboss-commons
            (which is becoming garguntuan :-)
            so I can see what is still used and how it fits together after we split off
            jbossxb, logging, protocol handlers, javabean editors, and threadpool/timeout/lru/etc.

            Reasons:
            * Allows other projects to take things ala carte
            * JBoss-commons is too big (discourages adoption of shared code and not invented here)
            * JBoss-commons has become a dumping ground
            * There is some leakage across jboss-commons utilities that shouldn't really be there (or if it should, it should be better thought out)
            * It doesn't make sense maintaining a different version of common utilities on every JBossAS branch

            JBossXB is the biggest part of it
            Logging is the most used - but many projects use commons-logging or roll your own because they don't want the large jboss-commons