This content has been marked as final.
Show 4 replies
-
1. Re: VirtualFile metadata
starksm64 Nov 7, 2006 9:05 AM (in response to bill.burke)Then we have to ensure that the same vf instance is used in a given context.
-
2. Re: VirtualFile metadata
bill.burke Nov 7, 2006 12:56 PM (in response to bill.burke)If you want to switch to "vfsfile:" based URLs you're gonna have to cache anyways. Otherwise, performance is horrible, at least with the current implementation.
Its just a thought. Maybe it doesn't matter overall. -
3. Re: VirtualFile metadata
starksm64 Nov 8, 2006 6:22 AM (in response to bill.burke)I guess I would first ask why we can't leave this in the deployer attachments realm:
VirtualFile vf = ... ClassFile cf = ... unit.addAttachment(vf.getPathName(), cf, cf.getClass());
so that we don't have to be looking in multiple places for the deployment metadata. -
4. Re: VirtualFile metadata
bill.burke Nov 8, 2006 10:35 AM (in response to bill.burke)guess you're right...