General Discussion on MetaTypes assigned to certain ManagedP

[bytor99999]

So instead of creating a new thread for each one that I come across, I am going to post in this thread.

So far there is the

DataSource Connection Properties

[bytor99999]

In JMS Destinations
securityConfig=ManagedProperty{securityConfig,securityConfig,metaType=MutableCompositeMetaType{org.w3c.dom.Element items=[name=schemaTypeInfo type=org.w3c.dom.TypeInfo], [name=tagName type=java.lang.String]}},

A CompositeMetaType holds a map of values.

/** The contents */
private SortedMap<String, MetaValue> contents;

However for security config, I think in terms of a List of users, that have a map of attributes.

For our Embedded Console UI, the List of Maps works perfect to create a user interaction that makes sense. But if it were just a Map of values, that would not work as you wouldn't be able to determine which User got which values.


Thank you guys for your help

[bytor99999]

JMS Destinations

The following three

serverPeer=ManagedProperty{serverPeer,serverPeer,metaType=MutableCompositeMetaType{javax.management.ObjectName items=[name=MBeanServer type=javax.management.MBeanServer], [name=canonicalKeyPropertyListString type=java.lang.String], [name=canonicalName type=java.lang.String], [name=domain type=java.lang.String], [name=domainPattern type=java.lang.Boolean], [name=keyPropertyList type=java.util.Map], [name=keyPropertyListString type=java.lang.String], [name=pattern type=java.lang.Boolean], [name=propertyPattern type=java.lang.Boolean]}}

expiryQueue=ManagedProperty{expiryQueue,expiryQueue,metaType=MutableCompositeMetaType{javax.management.ObjectName items=[name=MBeanServer type=javax.management.MBeanServer], [name=canonicalKeyPropertyListString type=java.lang.String], [name=canonicalName type=java.lang.String], [name=domain type=java.lang.String], [name=domainPattern type=java.lang.Boolean], [name=keyPropertyList type=java.util.Map], [name=keyPropertyListString type=java.lang.String], [name=pattern type=java.lang.Boolean], [name=propertyPattern type=java.lang.Boolean]}},

DLQ=ManagedProperty{DLQ,DLQ,metaType=MutableCompositeMetaType{javax.management.ObjectName items=[name=MBeanServer type=javax.management.MBeanServer], [name=canonicalKeyPropertyListString type=java.lang.String], [name=canonicalName type=java.lang.String], [name=domain type=java.lang.String], [name=domainPattern type=java.lang.Boolean], [name=keyPropertyList type=java.util.Map], [name=keyPropertyListString type=java.lang.String], [name=pattern type=java.lang.Boolean], [name=propertyPattern type=java.lang.Boolean]}}, name=ManagedProperty{name,name,metaType=SimpleMetaType:java.lang.String},


To be consistent and also really help me out. Shouldn't the items in a Map also be of a MetaType instead of direct Java types? Maybe even the keys.

If properties nest in terms of types, like a List of Maps or a Map which has some Lists which are Lists of Maps, it makes it easier to read and create adapters when you are always are dealing directly with MetaTypes and MetaValues.

Thanks

[bytor99999]

The same as the last post with Destinations for

messageCounters=ManagedProperty{messageCounters,messageCounters,metaType=MutableCompositeMetaType{org.jboss.jms.server.messagecounter.MessageCounter items=[name=count type=java.lang.Integer], [name=countDelta type=java.lang.Integer], [name=counterAsString type=java.lang.String], [name=destinationDurable type=java.lang.Boolean], [name=destinationName type=java.lang.String], [name=destinationSubscription type=java.lang.String], [name=destinationTopic type=java.lang.Boolean], [name=historyAsString type=java.lang.String], [name=historyLimit type=java.lang.Integer], [name=lastUpdate type=java.lang.Long], [name=messageCount type=java.lang.Integer], [name=messageCountDelta type=java.lang.Integer]}},

And all the Operations that return values like listAllMessages

Thanks

[starksm64]

Let's start creating jira issues for agreed on changes.
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-5194 - ds connection properties

The destination security config should be a map of role names with the value of each role being a list of permissions.

All property types should be MetaType/MetaValues. This looks like a generic problem with the mbean service management view.